Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://dspace.azti.es/handle/24689/1077
Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorMerino, Gorka-
dc.contributor.authorMurua, Hilario-
dc.contributor.authorSantiago, Josu-
dc.contributor.authorArrizabalaga, Haritz-
dc.contributor.authorRestrepo, Victor-
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-02T08:12:06Z-
dc.date.available2021-07-02T08:12:06Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifierISI:000586592000001-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.azti.es/handle/24689/1077-
dc.description.abstractTunas sustain important fisheries that face sustainability challenges worldwide, including the uncertainty inherent to natural systems. The Kobe process aims at harmonizing the scientific advice and management recommendations in tuna regional fisheries management organizations (RFMOs) toward supporting the sustainable exploitation of tunas globally. In this context, we review the similarities and differences among tuna RFMOs, focusing on stock assessment methodologies, use of information, characterization of uncertainty and communication of advice. Also, under the Kobe process, tuna RFMOs have committed to a path of adopting harvest strategies (HSs), also known as management procedures (MPs), which are the series of actions undertaken to monitor the stock, make management decisions, and implement the management measures. The adoption of HSs for tuna stocks is supported by Management Strategy Evaluation (MSE), which is considered the most appropriate way to assess the consequences of uncertainty for achieving fisheries management goals. Overall, notable progress has been made in achieving some of the Kobe objectives, but there are still some aspects that are inconsistent and need to be agreed upon, due to their management implications. First, not all RFMOs report on stock status based on maximum sustainable yield (MSY) as a reference. Instead, some use depletion level to represent the available fish biomass. Also, the definition of overexploited is not common in all oceans. Finally, very few stock assessments characterize all major sources of uncertainty inherent to fisheries. With regards to HSs, two different approaches are being followed: One is designed to adopt an automatic decision rule once the stock status and management quantities have been agreed upon (harvest control rules (HCRs), not strictly an HS) and the other aims at adopting all the components of HSs (data, use of information and decision rule).-
dc.language.isoEnglish-
dc.publisherMDPI-
dc.subjectfisheries management-
dc.subjectuncertainty-
dc.subjectmanagement strategy evaluation-
dc.subjecttunas-
dc.subjectRFMO-
dc.subjectscientific advice-
dc.subjectstock assessment-
dc.subjectSTOCK ASSESSMENT-
dc.subjectFRAMEWORK-
dc.subjectALBACORE-
dc.subjectMODEL-
dc.subjectRISK-
dc.titleCharacterization, Communication, and Management of Uncertainty in Tuna Fisheries-
dc.typeReview-
dc.identifier.journalSUSTAINABILITY-
dc.format.volume12-
dc.contributor.funderInternational Seafood Sustainability Foundation (ISSF)-
dc.identifier.e-issn2071-1050-
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/su12198245-
Aparece en las tipos de publicación: Artículos científicos



Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.