Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://dspace.azti.es/handle/24689/1723
Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorClay, Patricia M.
dc.contributor.authorFerretti, Johanna
dc.contributor.authorBailey, Jennifer L. and Goti, Leyre
dc.contributor.authorDankel, Dorothy J.
dc.contributor.authorSanturtun, Marina
dc.contributor.authorFuller, Jessica
dc.contributor.authorLinke, Sebastian
dc.contributor.authorSchmidt, Joern
dc.contributor.authorNielsen, Kare Nolde and Goldsborough, David
dc.contributor.authorGroeneveld, Rolf
dc.contributor.authorFraga, Ana Rita and Elegbede, Isa
dc.contributor.authorRockmann, Christine
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-12T11:49:15Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-12T11:49:15Z-
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifierWOS:000991795200001
dc.identifier.citationICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 2023, 80, 1516-1528
dc.identifier.issn1054-3139
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.azti.es/handle/24689/1723-
dc.description.abstractWith increasing activities of multiple sectors in marine spaces, management of marine social-ecological systems requires more holistic approaches. Adopting such an approach, however, presents difficult institutional and disciplinary challenges. Here, we use the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) as a case study on the implementation of ecosystem-based management (EBM) and integrated ecosystem assessments (IEAs). ICES includes EBM and IEAs in its Science Priorities and established IEA Working Groups (WGs) to carry out regional IEAs. But to what degree does this IEA WG work follow best practices? We examine policy documents, academic literature, and interview data from chairs of all IEA WGs. Results indicate mixed success. All groups acknowledge the holistic goals of IEA, and many use the IEA model as laid out by Levin et al. However, we found a significant variation in the degree to which the full model is applied. We identified two primary areas for improvement: (1) integration of social and economic issues and (2) involvement of stakeholders. We offer examples of how WGs have been making progress towards full IEAs, discuss how ICES can further support this transition, and suggest lessons with respect to the adoption of EBM and IEAs more broadly.
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.publisherOXFORD UNIV PRESS
dc.subjectInternational Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES)
dc.subjectIntegrated Ecosystem Assessments (IEAs)
dc.subjectSocial Science Methods
dc.subjectSemi-Structured Interviews
dc.subjectORGANIZATIONAL-CHANGE
dc.subjectMANAGEMENT LESSONS
dc.subjectKEY PRINCIPLES
dc.subjectFISHERIES
dc.subjectFRAMEWORK
dc.subjectBARRIERS
dc.subjectSUPPORT
dc.subjectSCIENCE
dc.subjectADVICE
dc.titleImplementation of integrated ecosystem assessments in the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea-conceptualizations, practice, and progress
dc.typeArticle; Early Access
dc.identifier.journalICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE
dc.format.page1516-1528
dc.format.volume80
dc.identifier.e-issn1095-9289
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/icesjms/fsad079
Aparece en las tipos de publicación: Artículos científicos



Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.