Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://dspace.azti.es/handle/24689/2467
Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorDilek, Filiz Bengu : Barampouti, Elli M. : Mai, Sofia : Moustakas, Konstantinos
dc.contributor.authorMalamis, Dimitris
dc.contributor.authorMartin, David S.
dc.contributor.authorYetis, Ulku
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-13T12:27:36Z-
dc.date.available2025-11-13T12:27:36Z-
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifierWOS:001463076700001
dc.identifier.citationWASTE AND BIOMASS VALORIZATION, 2025, 16, 3873-3894
dc.identifier.issn1877-2641
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.azti.es/handle/24689/2467-
dc.description.abstractThis study examines the environmental and economic sustainability of producing a feed ingredient from waste orange peels (OP), for use in animal feed, focusing on two waste valorization strategies: one involving hydrolyzed and the other non-hydrolyzed OP. Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costing (LCC) methodologies were employed to assess the environmental impacts and economic feasibility. LCA data were derived from lab-scale experiments and existing literature, using the ReCiPe 2016 (H) method to quantify environmental impacts per tonne of animal feed. Key findings show that hydrolyzing OP results in higher impacts compared to non-hydrolyzed variant, primarily due to the saccharification-hydrolysis process, though this difference becomes negligible at the animal feed production stage. Sensitivity analysis reveals that variations in input materials, except for transport distance-particularly for the non-hydrolyzed variant-have limited effects on LCA outcomes. Comparisons with business-as-usual scenarios (landfilling, composting and incineration) show that while waste valorization reduces environmental impacts, it does not surpass incineration due to energy recovery potential. LCC analysis indicates that producing non-hydrolyzed feed ingredient is significantly more cost-effective than the hydrolyzed variant. Overall, the LCA and LCC results suggest that while OP waste valorization offers notable environmental benefits, non-hydrolyzed feed ingredient production is the more economically viable option, contributing to sustainable feed production. This study highlights the importance of integrating both environmental and economic considerations in waste valorization strategies and provides guidance for waste management companies and animal feed manufacturers to support circular economy practices.
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.publisherSPRINGER
dc.subjectLCA
dc.subjectLCC
dc.subjectWaste orange peel
dc.subjectWaste valorization
dc.subjectAnimal feed
dc.subjectFOOD WASTE
dc.titleOrange Peel Waste Valorization: An Integrated Assessment of Environmental and Economic Sustainability in Animal Feed Production
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.journalWASTE AND BIOMASS VALORIZATION
dc.format.page3873-3894
dc.format.volume16
dc.contributor.funderPRIMA program [2013]
dc.contributor.funderEuropean Union
dc.identifier.e-issn1877-265X
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12649-025-03044-2
Aparece en las tipos de publicación: Artículos científicos



Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.