Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.azti.es/handle/24689/499
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorVanaverbeke, Jan-
dc.contributor.advisorVassilopoulou, Vassiliki-
dc.contributor.authorBuhl-Mortensen, Lene-
dc.contributor.authorGalparsoro, Ibon-
dc.contributor.authorFernandez, Tomas Vega-
dc.contributor.authorD'Anna, Giovanni-
dc.contributor.authorBadalamenti, Fabio-
dc.contributor.authorGarofalo, Germana-
dc.contributor.authorCarlstrom, Julia-
dc.contributor.authorPiwowarczyk, Joanna-
dc.contributor.authorRabaut, Marijn-
dc.contributor.authorSchipper, Cor-
dc.contributor.authorvan Dalfsen, Jan-
dc.contributor.authorIssaris, Yiannis-
dc.contributor.authorvan Hoof, Luc-
dc.contributor.authorHostens, Kris-
dc.contributor.authorPace, Marie Louise-
dc.contributor.authorKnittweis, Leyla-
dc.contributor.authorStelzenmueller, Vanessa-
dc.contributor.authorTodorova, Valentina-
dc.contributor.authorDoncheva, Valentina-
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Kate-
dc.contributor.authorPecceu, Ellen-
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-29T10:21:03Z-
dc.date.available2018-06-29T10:21:03Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifierISI:000391904500021-
dc.identifier.citationMARINE POLICY, 2017, 75, 174-186-
dc.identifier.issn0308-597X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.azti.es/handle/24689/499-
dc.description.abstractA generic framework (FW) for the monitoring and evaluation of spatially managed areas (here defined as marine areas subject to a planning and management regime) was developed and tested in nine marine areas of 13 European countries under the EU funded project MESMA (Monitoring and Evaluation of Spatially Managed Areas). This paper describes the lessons learned in the use of the FW and draws conclusions for its future use and development. The selected case studies represented diverse spatial scales, management status and complexity, ranging from sub-national areas to entire national coastlines, and large offshore regions. The application of the FW consisted of seven steps: starting with (i) context setting and (ii) gathering of relevant ecosystem information, human activities and management goals; it continues with (iii) indicator selection and (iv) risk assessment; and the final steps considers the (v) analysis of findings and (vi) the evaluation of management effectiveness, to end up with (vii) the revision and proposal of adaptation to current management. The lessons learnt through the application of the FW in the case studies have proved the value of the FW. However, difficulties rose due to the diversity of the nature and the different stages of development in planning and management in the case study areas; as well as, limited knowledge on ecosystem functioning needed for its implementation. As a conclusion the FW allowed for a flexible and creative application and provided important gap analyses. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCI LTD-
dc.subjectMSP-Framework-
dc.subjectMarine Spatial Planning-
dc.subjectBlue Growth-
dc.subjectManagement-
dc.subjectHuman activities-
dc.subjectSpatial use conflicts-
dc.subjectMARINE-
dc.subjectDIVERSITY-
dc.subjectSTRAIT-
dc.subjectTOOLS-
dc.subjectAREAS-
dc.titleMaritime ecosystem-based management in practice: Lessons learned from the application of a generic spatial planning framework in Europe-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.journalMARINE POLICY-
dc.format.page174-186-
dc.format.volume75-
dc.contributor.funderEU FP7 program ``Monitoring and Evaluation of Spatially Managed Areas�� (MESMA) [226661]-
dc.identifier.e-issn1872-9460-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.marpol.2016.01.024-
Appears in Publication types:Artículos científicos



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.