Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://dspace.azti.es/handle/24689/499
Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.advisorVanaverbeke, Jan-
dc.contributor.advisorVassilopoulou, Vassiliki-
dc.contributor.authorBuhl-Mortensen, Lene-
dc.contributor.authorGalparsoro, Ibon-
dc.contributor.authorFernandez, Tomas Vega-
dc.contributor.authorD'Anna, Giovanni-
dc.contributor.authorBadalamenti, Fabio-
dc.contributor.authorGarofalo, Germana-
dc.contributor.authorCarlstrom, Julia-
dc.contributor.authorPiwowarczyk, Joanna-
dc.contributor.authorRabaut, Marijn-
dc.contributor.authorSchipper, Cor-
dc.contributor.authorvan Dalfsen, Jan-
dc.contributor.authorIssaris, Yiannis-
dc.contributor.authorvan Hoof, Luc-
dc.contributor.authorHostens, Kris-
dc.contributor.authorPace, Marie Louise-
dc.contributor.authorKnittweis, Leyla-
dc.contributor.authorStelzenmueller, Vanessa-
dc.contributor.authorTodorova, Valentina-
dc.contributor.authorDoncheva, Valentina-
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Kate-
dc.contributor.authorPecceu, Ellen-
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-29T10:21:03Z-
dc.date.available2018-06-29T10:21:03Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifierISI:000391904500021-
dc.identifier.citationMARINE POLICY, 2017, 75, 174-186-
dc.identifier.issn0308-597X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.azti.es/handle/24689/499-
dc.description.abstractA generic framework (FW) for the monitoring and evaluation of spatially managed areas (here defined as marine areas subject to a planning and management regime) was developed and tested in nine marine areas of 13 European countries under the EU funded project MESMA (Monitoring and Evaluation of Spatially Managed Areas). This paper describes the lessons learned in the use of the FW and draws conclusions for its future use and development. The selected case studies represented diverse spatial scales, management status and complexity, ranging from sub-national areas to entire national coastlines, and large offshore regions. The application of the FW consisted of seven steps: starting with (i) context setting and (ii) gathering of relevant ecosystem information, human activities and management goals; it continues with (iii) indicator selection and (iv) risk assessment; and the final steps considers the (v) analysis of findings and (vi) the evaluation of management effectiveness, to end up with (vii) the revision and proposal of adaptation to current management. The lessons learnt through the application of the FW in the case studies have proved the value of the FW. However, difficulties rose due to the diversity of the nature and the different stages of development in planning and management in the case study areas; as well as, limited knowledge on ecosystem functioning needed for its implementation. As a conclusion the FW allowed for a flexible and creative application and provided important gap analyses. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCI LTD-
dc.subjectMSP-Framework-
dc.subjectMarine Spatial Planning-
dc.subjectBlue Growth-
dc.subjectManagement-
dc.subjectHuman activities-
dc.subjectSpatial use conflicts-
dc.subjectMARINE-
dc.subjectDIVERSITY-
dc.subjectSTRAIT-
dc.subjectTOOLS-
dc.subjectAREAS-
dc.titleMaritime ecosystem-based management in practice: Lessons learned from the application of a generic spatial planning framework in Europe-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.journalMARINE POLICY-
dc.format.page174-186-
dc.format.volume75-
dc.contributor.funderEU FP7 program ``Monitoring and Evaluation of Spatially Managed Areas�� (MESMA) [226661]-
dc.identifier.e-issn1872-9460-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.marpol.2016.01.024-
Aparece en las tipos de publicación: Artículos científicos



Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.